Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1wTOp17UFa5yBbUpU8XouhK78YxJEYu7mGeZPgSUeK3kQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на cost based vacuum (parallel)  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: cost based vacuum (parallel)  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:54 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
For parallel vacuum [1], we were discussing what is the best way to
divide the cost among parallel workers but we didn't get many inputs
apart from people who are very actively involved in patch development.
I feel that we need some more inputs before we finalize anything, so
starting a new thread.

Maybe a I just don't have experience in the type of system that parallel vacuum is needed for, but if there is any meaningful IO throttling which is active, then what is the point of doing the vacuum in parallel in the first place?

Cheers,

Jeff

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Keep compiler silence (clang 10, implicit conversion from 'long' to 'double' )
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Include triggers in EXPLAIN