Re: index-only scans

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Janes
Тема Re: index-only scans
Дата
Msg-id CAMkU=1wPQkZ3yWd9kLCL18UHMDiTGJ0+4mUaa-FuMGYKQWkNZQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: index-only scans  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Please find attached a patch implementing a basic version of
>>> index-only scans.
>>
>> I'm making some progress with this, but I notice what seems like a
>> missing feature: there needs to be a way to turn it off.  Otherwise
>> performance comparisons will be difficult to impossible.
>>
>> The most obvious solution is a planner control GUC, perhaps
>> "enable_indexonlyscan".  Anyone object, or want to bikeshed the name?
>>
>
> Currently I can't force an indexonlyscan over an indexscan, because of
> the way the enable_* variables work.

OK, scratch that.  I must have been using the wrong query (for
which the index was not covering), as I can't reproduce the
behavior nor looking at the code can I see how it could have
occurred in the first place.

Cheers,

Jeff


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pushing ScalarArrayOpExpr support into the btree index AM
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pushing ScalarArrayOpExpr support into the btree index AM