Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Eyal Wilde
Тема Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)
Дата
Msg-id CAMiEbcjn4UQcsk=NSNmE4rbAE2TwLBviUGYOZmXFK5mYyHVu+A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на scale up (postgresql vs mssql)  (Eyal Wilde <eyal@impactsoft.co.il>)
Ответы Re: scale up (postgresql vs mssql)  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hi, all.

this is an obligation from the past:

the same test, that did ~230 results, is now doing ~700 results. that is, BTW even better than mssql.

the ultimate solution for that problem was to NOT to do "ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS" for the temporary tables. instead, we just do "DELETE FROM temp_table1".

doing "TRUNCATE temp_table1" is defiantly the worst case (~100 results in the same test). this is something we knew for a long time, which is why we did "ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS", but eventually it turned out as far from being the best.

another minor issue is that when configuring  temp_tablespace='other_tablespace', the sequences of the temporary tables remain on the 'main_tablespace'. 

i hope that will help making postgres even better :)

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Siddharth Shah
Дата:
Сообщение: High CPU Usage
Следующее
От: Eyal Wilde
Дата:
Сообщение: index-only scan is missing the INCLUDE feature