Re: [PATCH] Guard `CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY` & `MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING`
От | Samuel Marks |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Guard `CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY` & `MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING` |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMfPbcaRFpRZ1zXH6wvjuXD58xVk+NJQzTYF0+TJA7LhRTLRvA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Guard `CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY` & `MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING` (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Guard `CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY` & `MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING`
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
It will resolve the large number of these warnings from https://github.com/pgcentralfoundation/pgrx/blob/6dfb9d1/cargo-pgrx/src/command/init.rs#L411-L412: <command-line>: note: this is the location of the previous definition ./../../src/include/pg_config_manual.h:274: warning: "MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING" redefined | #define MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING | <command-line>: note: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from ../../../src/include/c.h:55, from ../../../src/include/postgres.h:46, from xactdesc.c:15: ../../../src/include/pg_config_manual.h:265: warning: "CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY" redefined | #define CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY and yes will be sending them a patch also. But there's no harm in not redefining symbols, so not sure why this is a controversial patch. On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 4:11 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Samuel Marks <samuelmarks@gmail.com> writes: > > Subject: [PATCH] [src/include/pg_config_manual.h] Guard `CLOBBER_FREED_MEMORY` > > & `MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING` > > Why is this a good idea? > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: