On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 08:01, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 10:08 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have changed the status of the commitfest entry to "Committed" as I >> noticed the patch has already been committed. > > Well, the situation seems a little complex here. At first, this thread > was dedicated to discussing the 'Examine-simple-variable-for-Var-in-CTE' > patch, which has already been pushed in [1]. Subsequently, I proposed > another patch 'Propagate-pathkeys-from-CTEs-up-to-the-outer-query' in > [2], which is currently under review and is what the commitfest entry > for. Later on, within the same thread, another patch was posted as a > fix to the first patch and was subsequently pushed in [3]. I believe > this sequence of events might have led to confusion. > > What is the usual practice in such situations? I guess I'd better to > fork a new thread to discuss my proposed patch which is about the > 'Propagate-pathkeys-from-CTEs-up-to-the-outer-query'.
Sorry I missed to notice that there was one pending patch yet to be committed, I feel you can continue discussing here itself just to avoid losing any historical information about the issue and the continuation of the discussion. You can add a new commitfest entry for this.
It seems to me that a fresh new thread is a better option. I have just started a new thread in [1], and have tried to migrate the necessary context over there. I have also updated the commitfest entry accordingly.