Re: Bug: var_is_nonnullable() gives wrong results for old/new in RETURNING
| От | Richard Guo |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bug: var_is_nonnullable() gives wrong results for old/new in RETURNING |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMbWs48swa+F+HmsxnVqYrSvDFgp9v7ShSjac5FsG4oFFKvs2w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Bug: var_is_nonnullable() gives wrong results for old/new in RETURNING (Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Bug: var_is_nonnullable() gives wrong results for old/new in RETURNING
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 10:30 AM Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com> wrote: > SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram@gmail.com> 于2026年4月10日周五 02:43写道: > > It appears the optimizer incorrectly simplifies old.<col> IS NULL to FALSE in RETURNING clauses when the underlying columnhas a NOT NULL constraint. > > > > The issue is that var_is_nonnullable() in clauses.c doesn't check Var.varreturningtype. It sees a NOT NULL column andconcludes the Var can never be NULL. > > But this assumption is wrong for old.* and new.* references. Because the old tuple doesn't exist on INSERT, and the newtuple doesn't exist on DELETE Nice catch. > Yes, the current var_is_nonnullable() ignores this case. The > attached patch seems ok to me. The patch also LGTM. I also checked if has_notnull_forced_var() has the same issue, but it doesn't: Vars with non-default returning type only appear in the RETURNING clause, so they never show up in WHERE/ON clauses. - Richard
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: