Re: plan shape work

On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 2:32 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> We sort of got started down this path because, reviewing v4-0003,
> Richard commented that I might be able to sanity-check
> something-or-other about RTE_JOIN RTIs instead of just focusing on
> baserels. From there, this sub-thread has turned into a discussion of
> exactly what that sanity check should be.

Yeah, when commenting on v4-0003 about including outer join relids in
the assertion, I had a feeling that it might take the discussion off
topic -- sorry that it did.  That's why I suggested moving this part
of discussion to a separate thread.

I still think that cross-checking outer join relids isn't a
requirement for committing your patches, so I'm totally fine if you
end up with a version that doesn't assert outer join relids.

- Richard