Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Guo
Тема Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()
Дата
Msg-id CAMbWs48fpP=OU5VLOGBBgvA4kxnPXTCVJh3Qayo1i-K=3Pt4Nw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()  (Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please look at a recent buildfarm failure [1], which shows some
> instability of that test addition:
>   -- the joinrel is not parallel-safe due to the OFFSET clause in the subquery
>   explain (costs off)
>       select * from tenk1 t1, (select * from tenk2 t2 offset 0) t2 where t1.two > t2.two;
> -                QUERY PLAN
> --------------------------------------------
> +                   QUERY PLAN
> +-------------------------------------------------
>    Nested Loop
>      Join Filter: (t1.two > t2.two)
> -   ->  Gather
> -         Workers Planned: 4
> -         ->  Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 t1
> +   ->  Seq Scan on tenk2 t2
>      ->  Materialize
> -         ->  Seq Scan on tenk2 t2
> +         ->  Gather
> +               Workers Planned: 4
> +               ->  Parallel Seq Scan on tenk1 t1
>   (7 rows)

Thank you for the report and investigation.  Will have a look.

Thanks
Richard



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Laurenz Albe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Следующее
От: Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CI, macports, darwin version problems