Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans?
От | Richard Guo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAMbWs4-zobtjyuNhSaYCXmCxnk9Ok8CoQGyt_ZS+fuYCAtxhew@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans? (Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans?
Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 8:18 AM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > I pushed the straightforward option for now so that it's fixed. I think this binary search code now has a risk of underflow. If 'mid' is calculated as zero, the second 'if' branch will cause 'end' to underflow. Maybe we need to do something like below. --- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam_handler.c @@ -2600,7 +2600,11 @@ SampleHeapTupleVisible(TableScanDesc scan, Buffer buffer, if (tupoffset == curoffset) return true; else if (tupoffset < curoffset) + { + if (mid == 0) + return false; end = mid - 1; + } else start = mid + 1; } Alternatively, we can revert 'start' and 'end' to signed int as they were before. Thanks Richard
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: