Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Richard Guo
Тема Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
Дата
Msg-id CAMbWs4-na1ynWwcanzQL85SyjgQ_QfNoxJ3vp3DH14iOtYiQ6g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 4:47 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In the meantime, I think this test case is mighty artificial,
> and it wouldn't bother me any to just take it out again for the
> time being.

Yeah, I think we can remove the 't1.two+t2.two' test case if we go
with your proposed patch to address this performance regression.

Thanks
Richard

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: