Re: Psql meta-command conninfo+

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> On 2024-Sep-16, Jim Jones wrote:
>> * The value of "Current User" does not match the function current_user()
>> --- as one might expcect. It is a little confusing, as there is no
>> mention of "Current User" in the docs. In case this is the intended
>> behaviour, could you please add it to the docs?

> It is intended.  As Peter said[1], what we wanted was to display
> client-side info, so PQuser() is the right thing to do.  Now maybe
> "Current User" is not the perfect column header, but at least the
> definition seems consistent with the desired end result.

Seems like "Session User" would be closer to being accurate, since
PQuser()'s result does not change when you do SET ROLE etc.

> Now, I think
> the current docs saying to look at session_user() are wrong, they should
> point to the libpq docs for the function instead; something like "The
> name of the current user, as returned by PQuser()" and so on.

Sure, but this does not excuse choosing a misleading column name
when there are better choices readily available.