Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hannu Krosing
Тема Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Дата
Msg-id CAMT0RQR0Op5uSgunWpcTRjge5sjXL1nGY=xLG8PxFn4Smy4gcw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: .ready and .done files considered harmful
Список pgsql-hackers
How are you envisioning the shared-memory signaling should work in the
original sample case, where the archiver had been failing for half a
year ?

Or should we perhaps have a system table for ready-to-archive WAL
files to get around limitation sof file system to return just the
needed files with ORDER BY ... LIMIT as we already know how to make
lookups in database fast ?

Cheers
Hannu


On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:24 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 3:23 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FWIW It's already done for v14 individually.
> >
> > Author: Fujii Masao <fujii@postgresql.org>
> > Date:   Mon Mar 15 13:13:14 2021 +0900
> >
> >     Make archiver process an auxiliary process.
>
> Oh, I hadn't noticed. Thanks.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: use `proc->pgxactoff` as the value of `index` in `ProcArrayRemove()`