Re: Clarification on RLS policy
| От | Vydehi Ganti |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Clarification on RLS policy |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAMH-PzUBLFXsNPeovtg1iLf=HqOxzgTBn+6iToPNnOY0ds9b=A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Clarification on RLS policy (Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Clarification on RLS policy
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Can i know if there is any scenario or ref document for the design you suggested above?
On Fri, 25 Apr, 2025, 18:56 Dominique Devienne, <ddevienne@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 3:21 PM Vydehi Ganti <rayudugs@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I don't have a possibility to append where clause dynamically and can only check the boolean?
Indeed. But given that you can run arbitrary SQL inside the function,
even dynamic SQL,
that ends up pretty much the same. And you have access to in-row
values too, when calling the function.
It's just a different design, that's all. --DD
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: