Re: [BUGS] BUG #14853: Parameter type is required even when the querydoes not need to know the type

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Eduardo Pérez Ureta
Тема Re: [BUGS] BUG #14853: Parameter type is required even when the querydoes not need to know the type
Дата
Msg-id CAM7oS3H9gU0Gqvz9B9p6h22i8363z=Pv3bdDj74g7-9wmEw8tQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [BUGS] BUG #14853: Parameter type is required even when the querydoes not need to know the type  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [BUGS] BUG #14853: Parameter type is required even when the querydoes not need to know the type
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14853: Parameter type is required even when the querydoes not need to know the type
Список pgsql-bugs
Дерево обсуждения
My example is even better!
There is no need to infer the type as it is not needed!
PostgreSQL should be able to infer that no type is needed.

On Oct 15, 2017 8:23 PM, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, October 15, 2017, Eduardo Pérez Ureta <edpeur@gmail.com> wrote:
I understand that not sending the type for a parameter (when it is not null) may not make much sense.
But, currently PostgreSQL accepts parameters with unknown types in statements like:
INSERT INTO t1 (col1) VALUES (?)
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE col1 = ?
where the column can be different types like VARCHAR or TIMESTAMP

col1 has a type and so the type of the unspecified variable can be inferred.  Your is null example cannot have its typed inferred.

David J.

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquery pullup
Следующее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Improper const-evaluation of HAVING with grouping sets and subquery pullup