Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4] [PATCH] History Tab rewrite in React

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Surinder Kumar
Тема Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4] [PATCH] History Tab rewrite in React
Дата
Msg-id CAM5-9D9cm88KaiNjAwyNQG7+0FNxcAEJ6xaWTS9+pJ-6uLLTWQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4] [PATCH] History Tab rewrite in React  (Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman@pivotal.io>)
Ответы Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4] [PATCH] History Tab rewrite in React  (Sarah McAlear <smcalear@pivotal.io>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
Hi

Review comments:

1) First patch contains changes related to copy row feature which is already in process in another thread. Any reason to add those changes in this patch as this patch is meant to contain infrastructure changes ?

2) Can the changes related to FeatureTest or Jasmine test be separated out in another patch?


Thanks,
Surinder


On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:59 AM, Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman@pivotal.io> wrote:
Hey Surinder,

Is it possible to run the task listed above by configuring them in "scripts" in package.json file and running concurrently ?

That would be cleaner than what we proposed. We could use the yarn run feature to do just what you are suggesting. It works the same as in npm.
Something like the following:
In package.json - 
"scripts": {
  "linter": "eslint pgadmin/static/jsx/**/*.jsx pgadmin/static/js/selection/*.js regression/javascript/**/*.jsx regression/javascript/**/*.js *.js"
}


To call it on the command line -
yarn run linter

- Matt

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Surinder Kumar <surinder.kumar@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Joao Pedro De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io> wrote:
The motivation is simple - we want a solution that works for the whole
app, can handle debug vs. release execution, pluggable modules, and
installations in read-only directories.
With the current configuration of Grunt, all the requirements you mention are available.
The tasks on Grunt should only be run under development or before we are creating the installer.


The installer should pick up only the bundled Javascript and should install it in the correct folders, this way there is no need to rewrite or process files in read-only directories of the end user machine.

Per the other thread on the subject (that Joao suggested continuing
discussion on), Surinder is currently looking into flask-webpack. I
spent some time playing with grunt and some other options last week.
We should continue the discussion about flask-webpack or Grunt or any other Build system in the other thread, but we need to have some decision because this patch needs a build system.
If we remove Grunt from this patch we will need to execute the following command every time the application run:

yarn run eslint pgadmin/static/jsx/**/*.jsx pgadmin/static/js/selection/*.js regression/javascript/**/*.jsx regression/javascript/**/*.js *.js && yarn run webpack -- --config webpack.config.js && python web/pgAdmin4

And to run the jasmine tests:

yarn run eslint pgadmin/static/jsx/**/*.jsx pgadmin/static/js/selection/*.js regression/javascript/**/*.jsx regression/javascript/**/*.js *.js && yarn run karma start

And to run the feature tests:

yarn run eslint pgadmin/static/jsx/**/*.jsx pgadmin/static/js/selection/*.js regression/javascript/**/*.jsx regression/javascript/**/*.js *.js && yarn run webpack -- --config webpack.config.js && python runtests.py

Is this a solution that is acceptable? 

As per my knowledge, Grunt can run the tasks and bundle the JS and CSS files (using r.js which is not preferred). But Webpack can not do both. It can only bundle files, it has to be used with either Grunt or Gulp to execute tasks.

Is it possible to run the task listed above by configuring them in "scripts" in package.json file and running concurrently ?

scripts: {
 "task-name1": "yarn run eslint filename",
​ ​
"task-name2": "yarn run karma start", so on...
}

and run them using following command:
npm run task-name1
 

However; this patch is supposed to be about the history tab rewrite.
Whatever solution we use for webpacking/transpiling/linting/minifying
etc, it should be a standalone change as it's decidedly non-trivial.
We split this patch into 2 different commits:
1 - Add React and all the tools needed to work with it, this includes Grunt, Webpack and ESLint
2 - Change the history tab

Do you want a single commit for each of the following? 
  React (just adds the React library via yarn)
  Webpack (adds Webpack library via yarn and creates the webpack.config.js)
  ESLint (adds ESLint library via yarn, creates .eslintrc config file, and corrects all lint errors that previously existed)
  Grunt (adds Grunt library via yarn and creates Gruntfile.js config, creating a pipeline of the previous three libraries/tasks)
  Our change to History

Thanks
Joao & Matt 

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Hi

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Matthew Kleiman <mkleiman@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> We are currently using the Grunt taskrunner to run the following tasks:
>
> lint the javascript code
> start javascript tests
> invoke webpack to transpile and bundle js and jsx files
> minify javascript
>
> In order to remove Grunt from the application, we will need some other tool
> to execute these listed tasks.
>
> There are other tools available, like Gulp.js, that we could use instead of
> Grunt. We would like to understand your motivation for removing Grunt so we
> can find a better solution.

The motivation is simple - we want a solution that works for the whole
app, can handle debug vs. release execution, pluggable modules, and
installations in read-only directories.

Per the other thread on the subject (that Joao suggested continuing
discussion on), Surinder is currently looking into flask-webpack. I
spent some time playing with grunt and some other options last week.

However; this patch is supposed to be about the history tab rewrite.
Whatever solution we use for webpacking/transpiling/linting/minifying
etc, it should be a standalone change as it's decidedly non-trivial.

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company




В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Surinder Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4][Patch][RM_2400]: Columns withdefaults set to NULL when removing contents after pasting in the edit grid
Следующее
От: Murtuza Zabuawala
Дата:
Сообщение: [pgadmin-hackers] [pgAdmin4][PATCH] To fix the issue in procedure debugging in EPAS