Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZTF2x1Wa+d95O2s7pKd2y7r+yidMNAB8B__tXA2E62xQw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : Parallel Merge Join  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> 3. 20_patch.out  : Explain analyze output with patch (median of 3 runs)

I noticed that the partially parallelized Merge Join EXPLAIN ANALYZE
that you attach has a big misestimation:

->  Merge Join  (cost=3405052.45..3676948.66 rows=320 width=32)
(actual time=21165.849..37814.551 rows=1357812 loops=4)

Is this the best test case to show off the patch? This node is the
immediate outer child of a Nested Loop Semi Join, and so I'm concerned
that we measuring the wrong thing.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Karl O. Pinc"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Следующее
От: "Karl O. Pinc"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function