Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZTBr6uzguNN7+=8ouhnv6R20Rsnt2-K=G4N-KCLX_jW1A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:26 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> I have been annoyed by this multiple times. I think we should make sure the C99 defines are there (providing values
ifthey aren't) and always use those. We've used them in parts of the tree long enough that it's unlikely to cause
problems.Nothing is helped by using different things in other parts of the tree. 


+1

--
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove fsync ON/OFF as a visible option?
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: barnacle (running CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY) seems stuck since November