On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Per your other email, here's the patch again; hopefully I've got the
> right stuff in the file this time.
Your patch looks fine to me. I recommend committing patch 1 with these
additions. I can't think of any reason to rehash the 2012 discussion.
--
Peter Geoghegan