Re: autovacuum_work_mem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: autovacuum_work_mem
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSZCqCEeMajbQ3eJgT=7wexhhc6d3LH7bZhNme6sT+4TA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: autovacuum_work_mem  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> That's about 2-3 days work and I know Peter can hack it. So the
> situation is not perfection-sought-blocking-good, this is more like
> fairly poor solution being driven through when a better solution is
> available within the time and skills available.

I think that that's a very optimistic assessment of the amount of work
required. Even by the rose-tinted standards of software project time
estimation. A ton of data is required to justify fundamental
infrastructural changes like that.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Daniel Wood
Дата:
Сообщение: 9.3 reference constraint regression
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: -d option for pg_isready is broken