On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> It'll be yet another way for people to get upsert wrong, of course.
> They'll use a wCTE with RETURNING REJECTS to do an UPDATE of the rejects
> w/o locking the table against writes first. Documenting this pitfall
> should be enough, though.
My preferred solution is to actually provide a variant to lock the
rows implicated in the would-be unique constraint violation. Obviously
that's a harder problem to solve.
--
Peter Geoghegan