Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSY6X6o63q-ytW0TS==+=GGJhHsTc1KTobw5txFvTZPeQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave  (Ian Barwick <ian@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave
Re: Possible index issue on 9.5 slave
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Ian Barwick <ian@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Interesting, I'll take a look later.

I'm pretty suspicious of incompatibilities that may exist between the
two sets of OS collations involved here. We aren't very clear on the
extent to which what you're doing is supported, but it's certainly the
case that bttextcmp()/varstr_cmp()/strcoll() return values must be
immutable between the two systems. Still, it should be possible to
determine if that's the problem using btreecheck.

Do you get perfectly consistent answers between the two when you ORDER BY login?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink
Следующее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink