Re: local_preload_libraries logspam

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: local_preload_libraries logspam
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZSCcfxPETw-YftTd9tmwceSrZPMaD0ngvSgmKsXfgxnKw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: local_preload_libraries logspam  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> On the other hand, if we have it as DEBUG2 in the EXEC_BACKEND code
> path, I would be willing to argue that that's too low.  If you're
> starting to feel a need to inquire into the backend's behavior, knowing
> about loaded modules seems like one of the first things you need to know
> about.  Hence, I'd vote for DEBUG1.

+1 to DEBUG1.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Make targets of doc links used by phpPgAdmin static
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: XLogFlush invoked about twice as many times after 9.2 group commit enhancement