Re: [PROPOSAL] timestamp informations to pg_stat_statements

On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The concern I've got about this proposal is that the results get very
> questionable as soon as we start dropping statement entries for lack
> of space.  last_executed would be okay, perhaps, but first_executed
> not so much.

Agreed.

Also, for what it's worth, I should point out to Jun that
GetCurrentTimestamp() should definitely not be called when a spinlock
is held like that.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan