Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 7:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps we're honoring this more in the breech than in the observance,
> but I'm not making up what Tom has said about this:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/27310.1251410965@sss.pgh.pa.us
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/19174.1299782543@sss.pgh.pa.us
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3413.1301154369@sss.pgh.pa.us
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3261.1401915832@sss.pgh.pa.us

Of course, not doing a catversion bump after beta1 doesn't necessarily
have much value in and of itself. *Promising* to not do a catversion
bump, and then usually keeping that promise definitely has a certain
value, but clearly we are incapable of that.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan