On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure this is well thought out. It would mean for example that
> we could never implement EXPLAIN options that are mutually exclusive
> ... at least, not without having to redefine ALL as all-except-something.
> Non-boolean options would be problematic as well.
While the spelling needs work, I like the general idea.
--
Peter Geoghegan