Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQkfqf=Z8cQq4z7bvbetY0tZ6BF-2v6+itDS+RRtTXKGQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT  (Yourfriend <doudou586@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Could be improved point of UPSERT  (Yourfriend <doudou586@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Yourfriend <doudou586@gmail.com> wrote:
> for example, SO201507_1001, PO201503_1280, etc.
>
> As these IDs would be the most important attribute to the business, so, we
> hope there is no gap for the IDs.

That's a requirement I've heard a number of times before. If you're
relying on a sequence for this purpose, your application is already
broken [1]. UPSERT need not be involved at all.

[1] http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/130.php
-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [DESIGN] Incremental checksums
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Memory Accounting v11