Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQTmjE+O-NnGthzLd61RtXkNfitWrZU6zJHHHZSB3YmEg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?  (Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> In parallel seq scan and join, do the "masters" behave as workers as well?

It depends. They will if they can. If the parallel seq scan leader
isn't getting enough work to do from workers (enough tuples to process
from the shared memory queue), it will start acting as a worker fairly quickly.
With parallel aggregate, and some other cases, that will always happen.

Even when the leader is consuming input from workers, that's still perhaps
pegging one CPU core. So, it doesn't really invalidate what I said about
the number of cores being the primary consideration.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jaime Casanova
Дата:
Сообщение: Rename synchronous_standby_names?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?