Re: Should commit_delay be PGC_SIGHUP?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Geoghegan
Тема Re: Should commit_delay be PGC_SIGHUP?
Дата
Msg-id CAM3SWZQ+RVikQ2Nwt+WKKneqxaJ8X3zK3ND+-6MS1Gu4qDh5JA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should commit_delay be PGC_SIGHUP?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is fine with me, too, and I agree that it's warranted... but your
> commit message supposes that this behavior is new in 9.3, and I think
> it dates to 9.2.

No, it doesn't. It just missed the deadline for 9.2.

I'm happy enough to have the setting be PGC_SUSET, since that more or
less conveys that commit_delay isn't something that is sensible to set
dynamically.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ants Aasma
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Page replacement algorithm in buffer cache
Следующее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON Function Bike Shedding