Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away
Дата
Msg-id CAM-w4HOeKBJ_Sf6NdHV3XrZxaPBKCEegjYOKR5EeRfMLt+6xNw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
Ответы Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>
> Just as an update I did get gcc to do the wrong thing on purpose. The
> only overflow check that the regression tests find missing is the one
> for int8abs() ie:


Also, one of the places GCC warns about optimizing away an overflow
check (with -fno-wrapv) is inside the localtime.c file from the tz
library. I fixed it in my patch but in fact I checked and it's already
fixed upstream so I'm wondering whether you expect to merge in an
updated tz library? Is there anything surprising about the process or
do you just copy in the files? Would you be happy for someone else to
do it?

-- 
greg



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MultiXact truncation, startup et al.
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: lock on object is already held