On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> > Yes, I did think about that, but it seems like a behavior change.
>> > However, it is tempting to avoid future bug reports about this.
>>
>> When this came up in March, Tom and I agreed that this wasn't something
>> we wanted to slip into 9.4. Given that, it is hard to argue we should
>> now slip this into 9.5, 9.4, and 9.3, so unless someone else votes for
>> inclusion, I think I will leave this as 9.5-only.
>
> With no one replying, I will consider this issue closed and not
> backpatch this.
I think the reason nobody's responding is because nobody has anything
significant to add. It's a behaviour change from not-working to
working. Why wouldn't it be backpatched?
--
greg