Re: maintenance_work_mem used by Vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: maintenance_work_mem used by Vacuum
Дата
Msg-id CAM-w4HOR0gp-yXBXDrLrG-EuAsJoi=WxTO9rws1nDRYT-k9YEw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: maintenance_work_mem used by Vacuum  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: maintenance_work_mem used by Vacuum  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
It's a bit unfortunate that we're doing the pending list flush while the vacuum memory is allocated at all. Is there any reason other than the way the callbacks are defined that gin doesn't do the pending list flush before vacuum does the heap scan and before it allocates any memory using maintenance_work_mem?

(I'm guessing doing it after vacuum is finished would have different problems with tuples in the pending queue not getting vacuumed?)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Connect as multiple users using single client certificate
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: v12.0: segfault in reindex CONCURRENTLY