On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Ah. Okay, but then what's wrong with the original proposal of "use ceil()
> instead of floor()"? Basically I think the idea of treating fractions
> less than one differently from fractions greater than one is bogus; nobody
> will ever find that intuitive.
Or make it an error to specify a value that rounds to 0 but isn't 0.
--
greg