Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index
Дата
Msg-id CAM-w4HO4GBM8OvZac3W8YdaU3MDkfQFA51qVup4RzR6ng2e5GQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #10432: failed to re-find parent key in index  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Список pgsql-bugs
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> I would be interested in seeing the structure of the index, if there is
> anything else corrupt in there.

So now let me check my arithmetic. block 175193 is the block starting
at byte offset 361439232 of 1665279.1 ?

And block 193740 is at byte offset 513376256 of 1665279.1 (which
appears to be off the end actually, but I haven't recovered the
database yet)

My math is:

8192 * ( 175193 - 131072 )
361439232

8192 * ( 193740 - 131072 )
513376256


--
greg

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_upgrade < 9.3 -> >=9.3 misses a step around multixacts