On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> So I now propose reverting the earlier two patches (but not their
>> regression test cases of course) and instead hacking MergeAppend plan
>> building as per (2).
As a wise man once said, "This is tricky stuff". I feel a better that
I got stuck on this stuff when you're still trying to feel your way
after this many go-arounds.
I think I'll be aiming at some less subtle things when I get back to
contributing. Things like the getrusage patch I still haven't
forgotten about.
--
greg