Re: Missing semicolumn in anonymous plpgsql block does not raise syntax error
От | Mor Lehr |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing semicolumn in anonymous plpgsql block does not raise syntax error |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALyvM2b+5ERWeUK5av2udxMzGk18eaUitzrrAAM7h9ZTz=yMRg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Missing semicolumn in anonymous plpgsql block does not raise syntax error (Mor Lehr <mor.lehr@deel.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Thanks for not letting this be forgotten :)
Unfortunately, plpgsql_check does not help me because it's not supported on AWS.
I also saw you wrote a patch which is still pending, I will probably have to wait for that.
Thanks again,
Mor
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 7:48 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
Hine 2. 6. 2024 v 18:25 odesílatel Mor Lehr <mor.lehr@deel.com> napsal:Thanks for the reference.We learn new stuff every day.You can close the case.Thanks, Morplpgsql_check can now detect this issueRegardsPavelOn Sun, Jun 2, 2024, 18:31 David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:On Sunday, June 2, 2024, Mor Lehr <mor.lehr@deel.com> wrote:Thanks for the prompt reply.Can you please refer me to the section in the documentation that describes this behavior?This (automatically interperting 1 as select 1) is totally an unexpected behavior for me.“As explained previously, the expression in such a statement is evaluated by means of an SQLSELECT
command sent to the main database engine.”David J.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: