Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shubham Barai
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8)
Дата
Msg-id CALxAEPuv2fRvEZMCNp1ZktMePMS2K-wOr3FgYoaqEzb_nWvPMg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8)  (Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8)  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi.

I am attaching a patch for predicate locking in SP-Gist index


Regards,
Shubham



Sent with Mailtrack

On 26 July 2017 at 20:50, Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss@gmail.com> wrote:
Project: Explicitly support predicate locks in index AMs besides b-tree

Hi,

During this week, I worked on predicate locking in spgist index. I think, for spgist index, predicate lock only on leaf pages will be enough as spgist searches can determine if there is a match or not only at leaf level.

I have done following things in this week.

1) read the source code of spgist index to understand  the access method

2) found appropriate places to insert calls to existing functions

3) created tests (to verify serialization failures and to demonstrate the feature of reduced false positives) for 'point' and 'box' data types.
    

I will attach the patch shortly.


Regards,
Shubham



Sent with Mailtrack

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call
Следующее
От: Noah Misch
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] segfault in HEAD when too many nested functions call