Re: pgjdbc-ng

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Guillaume Smet
Тема Re: pgjdbc-ng
Дата
Msg-id CALt0+o8DGNFRBFiTkZmcCD0TG32_bGLCOG44J0zNo856RycD9Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgjdbc-ng  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Ответы Re: pgjdbc-ng  (Kevin Wooten <kdubb@me.com>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Hi Heikki,

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> That should be easy to fix. Looking at PGtype, where the query is coming
> from, all you need to do is add another version of the query without the
> reference to pg_range. The logic for sending a different version of the
> query depending on the server version is already there.

I haven't taken a look at the code because IIRC they didn't want to
bloat the driver with support for old versions.

From my point of view, 9.1 would be the perfect starting point as it's
still widely in production and it will probably stay that way for a
while. But there may be good reasons to not support it.

If support for 9.1 is something they are interested in, we can take a
look at it. Just ping me.

--
Guillaume


В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adib Saikali
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JDBC Maven Checksum
Следующее
От: Kevin Wooten
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgjdbc-ng