Re: Use standard SIGHUP and SIGTERM handlers in autoprewarm module

On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 11:20 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Probably we can also replace sigHupHandler() in syslogger.c with
> >> SignalHandlerForConfigReload()? This would be separate patch, though.
> >>
> >
> > +1 to replace sigHupHandler() with SignalHandlerForConfigReload() as
> > the latch and the functionality are pretty much the same.
> >
> > WalReceiverMai(): I think we can also replace WalRcvShutdownHandler()
> > with SignalHandlerForShutdownRequest() because walrcv->latch point to
> > &MyProc->procLatch which in turn point to MyLatch.
> >
> > Thoughts? If okay, we can combine these into a single patch. I will
> > post an updated patch soon.
>
> +1 Or it's also ok to make each patch separately.
> Anyway, thanks!
>

Thanks. +1 to have separate patches. I will post two separate patches
for autoprewarm and WalRcvShutdownHandler for further review. The
other two patches can be for startup.c and syslogger.c.

With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com