Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bharath Rupireddy
Тема Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
Дата
Msg-id CALj2ACWk5a-LfBPziAjjFA--syoUSD_4jY6dZyhU8g8XuD-i7g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation  (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 12:40 PM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> v13-0001 looks good to me. The only Nit (that I've mentioned up-thread) is that
> in the pg_replication_slots view, the invalidation_reason is "far away" from the
> conflicting field. I understand that one could query the fields individually but
> when describing the view or reading the doc, it seems more appropriate to see
> them closer. Also as "failover" and "synced" are also new in version 17, there
> is no risk to break order by "17,18" kind of queries (which are the failover
> and sync positions).

Hm, yeah, I can change that in the next version of the patches. Thanks.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Broken EXPLAIN output for SubPlan in MERGE