Re: EXPLAIN/EXPLAIN ANALYZE REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bharath Rupireddy
Тема Re: EXPLAIN/EXPLAIN ANALYZE REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
Дата
Msg-id CALj2ACURBP=ENmgskuxDS61V5x8zotwJ55ak2VmOWLJZGedOPA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: EXPLAIN/EXPLAIN ANALYZE REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Jul 10, 2021 at 5:19 PM John Naylor
<john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Side note for future reference: While the feature named in the CF entry has been rejected, the remaining 0001 patch
currentlyproposed no longer matches the title, or category. It is possible within the CF app, and helpful, to rename
theentry when the scope changes. 
>
> The proposed patch in the CF for incremental view maintenance [1] does some refactoring of its own in implementing
thefeature. I don't think it makes sense to commit a refactoring that conflicts with that, while not necessarily making
lifeeasier for that feature. Incremental view maintenance is highly desirable, so I don't want to put up unnecessary
roadblocks.

Thanks. I'm okay to close the CF
entry(https://commitfest.postgresql.org/33/2928/) and stop this
thread.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: vignesh C
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal - psql - use pager for \watch command
Следующее
От: Bharath Rupireddy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bugfix: when the blocksize is 32k, the function page_header of pageinspect returns negative numbers.