C function migration from 9.2 to 9.5

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Omotayo Akinde
Тема C function migration from 9.2 to 9.5
Дата
Msg-id CALfUbhMU6VvD7WCsepJVMyNkx1P_hjWMOVjgLbqupoPU9k-BxQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: C function migration from 9.2 to 9.5  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: C function migration from 9.2 to 9.5  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Hi,

We've been having a Postgresql database with some custom C functionality happily running for many years now. It's been running on 9.2, and we wish to upgrade this to the latest version. However, we're seeing some issues with the database process crashing each time.

A simplified, minimal example of the stuff that seems to get us into trouble:

SQL definitions:
----

CREATE TYPE sessionData AS ( a int4, b int4, c int4 ); 

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION 
__WCI_SCHEMA__.getSessionData
()
RETURNS sessionData AS
'db_libdir/db_lib', 'session_get'
LANGUAGE 'C' STABLE;

----
Function definition:
----

PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 (session_get);
Datum session_get(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) {
  Datum ret = packSessionData( 0, 0, 0, fcinfo);
  return ret;
}

Datum packSessionData( int a, int b, int c, FunctionCallInfo fcinfo )
{
    TupleDesc td;
    if ( get_call_result_type( fcinfo, NULL, & td ) != TYPEFUNC_COMPOSITE )
    {
        ereport( ERROR,
                 ( errcode( ERRCODE_DATA_EXCEPTION ),
                   errmsg( "\'packSessionData\': Function returning record called in context that cannot accept type record" ) ) );
    }
    td = BlessTupleDesc( td );

    Datum * ret = ( Datum * ) palloc( 3 * sizeof( Datum ) );
    bool isNull[ 3 ] = {false, false, false};

    ret[ 0 ] = Int32GetDatum( a );
    ret[ 1 ] = Int32GetDatum( b );
    ret[ 2 ] = Int32GetDatum( c );

    HeapTuple ht = ( HeapTuple ) heap_form_tuple( td, ret, isNull );
    return HeapTupleGetDatum( ht );
}

----

Running "select getSessionData()" with this code crashes the database. Pretty much identical code worked fine in 9.2; it's only from 9.3+ we run into trouble. I'm sure we're overseeing something completely basic that has changed in 9.3, but having trouble seeing what it is. A little help would be appreciated.

Regards,

Michael A.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Premsun Choltanwanich"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: could not migrate 8.0.13 database with large object data to 9.5.1
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: C function migration from 9.2 to 9.5