Re: C function migration from 9.2 to 9.5

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Omotayo Akinde
Тема Re: C function migration from 9.2 to 9.5
Дата
Msg-id CALfUbhMCU30obRtBHvjr9PYjEdZjGKxtsNkU1kDf0rbx58r9JA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: C function migration from 9.2 to 9.5  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
Nailed it. Ensuring heap_form_tuple was properly defined resolved the issue.

Thanks a lot. Without your help, I would probably have spent more time looking at the 32 <=> 64 bit thing first, since I was pretty certain that we had this warning in the old compile. I suspect I am wrong about that, though, and that the actual problem is the heap_form_tuple declaration being relocated, as you suggest. In either case, going through the code and ensuring that we had that include everywhere in the code seems to have cleared up the problems (all tests running OK).

Regards,

Michael A.

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Michael Omotayo Akinde <michaeloa@met.no> writes:
> This throws a compiler warning on the cast from heap_form_tuple to
> HeapTuple, but IIRC it's always done that so not an error?

Uh, that's *awfully* fishy, because heap_form_tuple certainly returns
HeapTuple.  I wondered why you had that cast there; it should not be
necessary.  If the compiler is warning about it, that sets off all kinds
of alarm bells.

I notice your test program fails to #include "access/htup_details.h",
which is where heap_form_tuple() is declared these days.  I wonder if
your problem boils down to "no visible declaration of function, so
compiler thinks it returns int"?  In that case the real difference
from what worked to what didn't probably had less to do with any PG
version change and more to do with moving from 32-bit to 64-bit.
(Or I guess we might've relocated the declaration of heap_form_tuple
somewhere along the line.)

A general tip for getting C code to work is to turn on as many
compiler warnings as you can, and never ignore any of them.

                        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Francisco Olarte
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multiple UNIQUE indices for FK
Следующее
От: Rafal Pietrak
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multiple UNIQUE indices for FK