On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 09:23, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 2:32 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 3:48 PM Ted Yu <yuzhihong@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > It seems the comment for `backend_subxact_overflowed` missed a word.
> > >
> > > Please see the patch.
> >
> > Committed this fix, thanks.
>
> Thanks, Robert!
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dilip Kumar
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
Hi hackers!
Nice patch, seems it may be useful in cases like alerting that subxid
overflow happened is database or whatever.
But I'm curious, what is the following work on this? I think it may be
way more helpful to, for example, log queries, causing sub-tx
overflow,
or even kill the backend, causing sub-tx overflow with GUC variables,
setting server behaviour.
For example, in Greenplum there is gp_subtransaction_overflow
extension and GUC for simply logging problematic queries[1]. Can we
have something
similar in PostgreSQL on the server-side?
[1]
https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/blob/6X_STABLE/gpcontrib/gp_subtransaction_overflow/gp_subtransaction_overflow.c#L42