On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 at 09:51, Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It may be have made sense to lock the row of replaced index in pg_class
> and pg_index until the transaction, altered it will be commmitted. But,
> because ALTER TABLE is not fully MVCC-safe, it may be expected (or
> acceptable) behaviour.
I suspect this is the case. If that is, should be reflect it in the doc?
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke