Re: processes stuck in shutdown following OOM/recovery
От | Kirill Reshke |
---|---|
Тема | Re: processes stuck in shutdown following OOM/recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALdSSPhvZxned+Aoag28nf8Txh5SW3Os8P4JAKALvKZ6wfeNgw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: processes stuck in shutdown following OOM/recovery (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 at 02:22, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 3:30 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2023 at 2:18 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 6:13 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > > > $ kill -9 2524495; sleep 0.05; pg_ctl -D ./pgdev.dat1 stop -m fast # 2524495 is a child's pid > > > > > > > This affects v15, and fails at ) but not its parent. > > > > > > Repro'd here. I had to make the sleep shorter on my system. Looking... > > > > The PostmasterStateMachine() case for PM_WAIT_BACKENDS doesn't tell > > the checkpointer to shut down in this race case. We have > > CheckpointerPID != 0 (because 7ff23c6d27 starts it earlier than > > before), and FatalError is true because a child recently crashed and > > we haven't yet received the PMSIGNAL_RECOVERY_STARTED handler that > > would clear it. Hmm. > > Here is a first attempt at fixing this. I am not yet 100% sure if it > is right, and there may be a nicer/simpler way to express the > conditions. It passes the test suite, and it fixes the repro that > Justin posted. FYI on my machine I had to use sleep 0.005 where he > had 0.05, as an FYI if someone else is trying to reproduce the issue. Hi! This patch needs a rebase.CF entry status now is Waiting On author. -- Best regards, Kirill Reshke
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: