Re: Built-in Raft replication
От | Kirill Reshke |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Built-in Raft replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALdSSPhmEUT+2Wg7SMa3gnOetNiugtbd43pXDmcWJnfZti4LqA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Built-in Raft replication (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Built-in Raft replication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 at 10:25, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote: > > I think I can provide some reasons why it cannot be neither extension, nor any part running within postmaster reign. > > 1. When joining cluster, there’s not PGDATA to run postmaster on top of it. You can join the cluster on pg_basebackup of its master; So I dont get why this is an anti-extension restriction. > 2. After failover, old Primary node must rejoin cluster by running pg_rewind and following timeline switch. You can run bash from extension, what's the point? > The system in hand must be able to manipulate with PGDATA without starting Postgres. -- Best regards, Kirill Reshke
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: