Re: Add comments about fire_triggers argument in ri_triggers.c
| От | Kirill Reshke |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Add comments about fire_triggers argument in ri_triggers.c |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALdSSPg-rnJ27pxR=7Z20q8+Vob2dqjSStUOyWCqpRtNWKw-qQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Add comments about fire_triggers argument in ri_triggers.c (Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 at 17:27, Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> wrote: > > Hi, > > SPI_execute_snapshot() has a argument called "fire_triggers". If this is false, > AFTER triggers are postponed to end of the query. This is true in normal case, > but set to false in RI triggers. > > This is introduced by 9cb84097623e in 2007. It is aimed to fire check triggers > after all RI updates on the same row are complete. > > However, I cannot find explanation of"why this is required" in the codebase. > Therefore, I've attached a patch add comments in ri_trigger.c for explaining why > fire_triggers is specified to false. > > SPI_execute_snapshot() are used in a few places in ri_trigger.c, but I added > the comments only in ri_PerformCheck() because SPI_execute_snapshot() are used > only for SELECT quereis in other places. Therefore, I wonder fire_triggers is > not needed to be false in these places, but I left them as is. > > Regards, > Yugo Nagata > > -- > Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp> Hi! I checked your patch and I agree that your comment makes things more clear. Your patch LGTM -- Best regards, Kirill Reshke
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: