Re: PostgreSQL benchmarked on XFS vs ZFS vs btrfs vs ext4

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Vick Khera
Тема Re: PostgreSQL benchmarked on XFS vs ZFS vs btrfs vs ext4
Дата
Msg-id CALd+dcfNt3QGjvNc5HcNsJTyxt7hQkaZQ+JdSAKmPeq5mBughQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL benchmarked on XFS vs ZFS vs btrfs vs ext4  (Toby Corkindale <toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Toby Corkindale
<toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au> wrote:
> The zpool was created against an LVM logical volume (which was the same one
> used for all the filesystems measured in the tests). That LV was itself part
> of a volume group that was striped over three disks (Western Digital
> WD1003FBYX).

So you're throwing in the complication of a logical volume manager
interfering with zfs.  If you put ZFS on three separate drives, it has
a better chance of optimizing its operations.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: different unnest function
Следующее
От: Ian Harding
Дата:
Сообщение: Log Apply Delay