On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 at 16:41, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
In general I'm for this patch. Some time ago I was working on a patch related to shared memory and noticed
no reason to have reset_shared() function.
Hi, hackers!
I see the proposed patch as uncontroversial and good enough to be committed. It will make the code a little clearer. Personally, I don't like leaving functions that are just wrappers for another and called only once. But I think that if there's a question of code readability it's not bad to restore the comments on the purpose of a call that were originally in the code.
PFA v2 of a patch (only the comment removed in v1 is restored in v2).
Overall I'd like to move it to RfC if none have any objections.