Re: UNIQUE null treatment option

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Borisov
Тема Re: UNIQUE null treatment option
Дата
Msg-id CALT9ZEHV1uQZzLY=adSF5Bhfj3DaSLCZRmUJCSF=5F0EjV5cUw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: UNIQUE null treatment option  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: UNIQUE null treatment option  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Makes sense.  Here is an updated patch with this change.

I didn't end up renaming anynullkeys.  I came up with names like
"anyalwaysdistinctkeys", but in the end that felt too abstract, and
moreover, it would require rewriting a bunch of code comments that refer
to null values in this context.  Since as you wrote, anynullkeys is just
a local concern between two functions, this slight inaccuracy is perhaps
better than some highly general but unclear terminology.
Agree with that. With the comment it is clear how it works.

I've looked at the patch v3. It seems good enough for me. CFbot tests have also come green.
Suggest it is RFC now.

--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov

Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fabrice Chapuis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Logical replication timeout problem
Следующее
От: Hamid Akhtar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parameter for planner estimate of recursive queries